tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8283723095760696431.comments2022-02-07T14:25:11.965+11:00Lines on the WaterErin O'Donnellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05350932623051518780noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8283723095760696431.post-34762540602577166932013-08-22T18:28:20.157+10:002013-08-22T18:28:20.157+10:00Sounds very exciting and educational Erin! No doub...Sounds very exciting and educational Erin! No doubt a fruitful exchange of ideas, (and an excellent lunch)!Nathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16149842527133159682noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8283723095760696431.post-43012532576200443342013-07-07T23:08:11.760+10:002013-07-07T23:08:11.760+10:00I'd really be interested in your views on the ...I'd really be interested in your views on the NZ water laws that allowed or encouraged the phrasing of an NZ river as a thing with the quality of personhood...nothing to do with your engaging and intelligent blog! It occurs to me that there's no possibility of the water laws that Australia has built up subsequent to the privatisation of water, being applied to the collaborative approach you speak of, without having to access environmental law as a whole. I see environmental law as a very market-driven thing in Australia. Also, I know little more about it than that what I think is the 1971 EPA (C'Wlth) is premised on the American model of environmental protection and that the American model is very market-driven - interesting to read your blog in the light of that fact.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com